Madampakkam Dhenupureeswarar Temple
Introduction
Legend
The saint named Kapila was a devotee of Lord Shiva. He regularly performed pooja (homage/prayer) to his favorite deity. Once, dissuaded by some thought, he performed the pooja by holding Shiva Linga's icon in his left arm. It was considered a sin. When the sage worried about this sin, Shiva came forward for his rescue. He blessed Kapila to become a cow and advised the latter to perform pooja regularly.
Accordingly, the sage, born as a cow in Madampakkam village, released milk on a small stone every day. Once its master noticed this and hit the cow at its udder. The cow could not bear the pain and it tapped its leg on the stone. Immediately, the stone started bleeding.
The frightened villagers dug the ground and discovered that the buried stone was not an ordinary stone but a small Shiva Linga. They informed their King about this, who subsequently built a temple for that Shiva Linga. Also, the sage who was in the form of the cow achieved moksha (salvation).
As the cow (called Dhenu in Sanskrit) worshiped Shiva, he is named Dhenupureeswara.
Another legend records that Indra, the King of Devas, worshiped Dhenupureeswarar, to get rid of his curse from the sage Agastya. There is also a legend that claims that King Bhageeratha worshiped Shiva Linga in this site.
History
Do we have evidence? Can this temple be considered as the early Chola architecture? Let us see.
The oldest inscription found within the current structure belongs to Kulotunga Chola III (1188 CE). Then, on what basis it is believed that Sundara Chola or Aniruddha Brahmaraya built this temple? A modern-day inscription from the HR&CE (Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments) claims that either of them might have constructed the shrine. Even a few historians have connected the origin of the temple with both of them. What made them believe so?
Probably, an inscription from Tiruvidanthai Adi Varaha temple is the base for all such theories and claims. The inscription (A.R. No. 262 of 1910) found on the sanctum's south wall records an agreement by Madampakkam Sabha. As per that inscription, Madampakkam was also known as Anidira Mangalam, and it was located in Nedungunra Nadu, a sub-division of Puliyur Kottam. It was inscribed during the third year of the rule of Rajakesarivarman.
Who was Rajakerivarman? That is the million-dollar question. Rajakeraivarman and Parakeraivarman were the titles used by the Chola Kings alternatively. So, which Rajakesari was referred to here - Aditya I, Gandaraditya Chola, Sundara Chola or Rajaraja Chola? There is no consensus among historians.
Whoever the King was, the stone inscription's period is 10th century CE, and it calls Madampakkam as Anidira Mangalam. This appears to be the only base for claiming that the village was gifted to Aniruddha Brahmaraya, and he subsequently constructed the temple.
Besides, a damaged slab discovered in the backyard of a temple priest in the village reveals that the temple existed in the 10th century CE. Two inscriptions on the slab (A.R. No. 188 and 189 of 1961-62) talk about the grant of land to Umaskandasahitar and Nampirattiyar in the Sittreri Mahadeva temple. The gift was from an officer named Rajakarpaka Pallavarsiyan, who was probably serving under Rajaraja Chola I.
Another detached inscription dated 11th century CE was discovered in the same year (A.R. No. 190 of 1961-62).
Let us stop discussing the inscriptions that were not found in the temple and start debating the inscriptions found within the current temple complex.
Inscription # 1
Inscription # 2
Inscription # 3
Inscription # 4
Inscription # 5
Inscription # 6
Inscription # 7
Inscription # 8
Inscription # 9
Inscription # 10
Inscription # 11
Inscription # 12
Inscription # 13
Inscription # 16
Inscription # 17
Inscription # 18
Inscription # 19
Inscription # 20
Inscription # 21, #22, #23 and #24
Inscription # 25
Inscription # 26
Conclusion
If we go by the architecture style and a few Chola period sculptures around the sanctum, the temple cannot be considered an early Chola temple. The earliest inscription calls the village as Ulaguiyya Vanda Chola Chaturvedi Mangalam. Kulotunga Chola III's title was Ulaguiyya Vanda Nayanaar. Hence, it can be considered that the village was named after him.
The site was named after Kulotunga Chola III. The earliest inscription found inside the temple is from his period. The architectural style of the temple cannot be much older than his period. Hence, we can conclude that the temple was repaired and re-built by Kulotunga Chola III.
We have inscriptions from the Cholas, Pandyas and Vijayanagara Kings in this temple. The oldest inscription is from Kulotunga Chola III (1188 CE) and the latest inscription is from Veerapratapa Sadasiva Maharaya (1546 CE) (excluding the inscriptions found outside the temple complex).
The sanctum (moolasthana), Ardha Mandapa and a few pillars in Maha Mandapa belong to the later Chola period (12th century CE).
The shrine of Dehnukambal appears to have been built in the 13th century CE by the Pandyas.
Most of the parts of the temple can be assigned to the 15th or the 16th century Vijayanagara period. The sub-shrines of the first prakara, the fortress walls around the entire temple complex, the unfinished temple tower, Maha mandapas of Dhenupureeswara and Dhenukambal, the sculptures on the pillars on the first prakara, the impressive unique sculptures on the 18 pillars in Mukha Mandapa and Nandi Mandapa are all Vijayanagara's works.
Although the inscriptions are from different periods, they all call the presiding deity as Sittreri Aaludaiya Nayanar. One inscription calls him Sittreri Mahadeva. None of them use the name Dhenupureeswarar. Hence, right from the Cholas till the Vijayanagaras, the deity was called Sittreri Aaludaiya Nayanar. Since when he was being called Dhenupureeswarar is not known.
The presiding Goddess is Dhenukambal. This is perhaps a later name given to her to sync with Dhenupureeswara. What was her original name? No inscription talks about her. So, we don't know.
Why was Dhenupureeswara called Sittreri Aaludaiya Nayanar? The word "Sittreri" means "small lake" in the Tamil language. Lord of the land of the small lake - that is the name of the deity if we loosely translate the original word. Madampakkam lake is not a small lake. (For those who want to know about the lake, please read my article at this link.) Did we have a much bigger lake nearby to call this lake a small lake? Else, the large temple tank, always with water to its brim, looked like a small lake? Not sure!
Besides the inscriptions, there is one more piece of evidence. Arunagirinathar, a Tamil poet and saint who lived in the 15th century CE had sung two hymns on Murugan of this temple. It appears that during his time, the temple was probably somewhat similar to what we see today, with many sub-shrines, including that of Murugan.
Temple Layout
Dhenupureeswara
Sanctum
Vimana
Koshta Murtis
Mandapas
Prakara
Sub-shrines
On the southwest corner of the prakara, the sub-shrine of Valanchuli Vinayaka is located. Stylistically, the icon of Ganesha can be dated to the later Chola period. The trunk of Ganesha is turned towards the right side, and hence he is named Valanchuli Vinayaka. The word "valam" means right side in Tamil.
Next to the shrine mentioned above, Maha Ganapati, a later period icon, is found in a sub-shrine.
The next one is the shrine of Karivaradaraja Perumal. A small icon of Vishnu is found in the standing posture. His consorts, Sri Devi and Bhoo Devi, are found on either side. This shrine is located precisely on the backside of Dhenupureeswara. It is unusual to find Vishnu in a separate shrine in the Shiva temple.
On moving further north, there is a shrine for Kapilanathar and Annapoorani. As per the legend, Kapila, in his original form as the sage, worshiped this Shiv Linga, and hence he is named Kapilanatha. On 20th, 21st, and 22nd April every year, the Sun rays directly fall on this Shiv Linga. Hundreds of devotees gather to witness this rare event.
On the northwest corner of the prakara, we have Shiva Subramanya with Valli and Devasena in a shrine. This is at least 500 years old icon, and Arunagirinathar sang hymns on this Murti. The details of those two Tamil hymns are provided at the end of this article.
Nataraja's shrine is found at the west end of north prakara. Besides the big bronze icons of Nataraja and Sivakami, various other bronze icons are also kept here. Two pairs of Uma-Mahesvara, Somaskanda, Sharbeswara, Subramanya-Valli-Devasena and Ganesha are some notable utsava (processional) images.
The small stone images of Bhairava and Surya are located on either side of the temple entrance, and they face the west side.
Dwarapalas
Dhenukambal
Navagraha
Mukha Mandapa
Other Features
Tower
Temple Tank
Temple Car
Tiruppugazh
Arunagirinathar was a Tamil poet and saint who had written many lyrics on Murugan of various temples. His collection of lyrics are collated as an anthology named Tiruppugazh. As stated already, he had written two hymns on Murugan of this temple. Those two Tamil hymns can be seen below.
Lyric - 1
Lyric - 2
மணந்துன் à®±ுஞ்செ à®´ுந்தாà®°்
புனைà®®ு கிà®±்குழல் தனைய விà®´்க்கவுà®®்
விடங்கஞ் சஞ்ச ரஞ்சேà®°்
விà®´ிவெ à®°ுட்டவு à®®ொà®´ிபு ரட்டவு
நிணந்துன் à®±ுஞ்ச லம்பா ...... யுதிரநீ à®°ுடனே
வெளியி னிà®±்கவுà®®் வலிய à®®ுட்டரை
யெதிà®°்ந்துà®®் பின்தொ டர்ந்தே
யிலைசு ணப்பொடி பிளவெ டுத்திடை
திà®°ுà®®்புà®®் பண்ப ரன்à®±ே
யெனவு à®°ைத்தவர் தமைவ ரப்பணி
யுடன்கொண் டன்பு டன்போய் ...... சயனபா யலின்à®®ேல்
கலைநெ கிà®´்க்கவு மயல்வி ளைக்கவு
நயங்கொண் டங்கி à®°ுந்தே
குணுகி யிட்டுள பொà®°ுள்ப à®±ித்தற
à®®ுனிந்தங் கொன்à®±ு கண்டே
கலக à®®ிட்டவ ரகல டித்தபின்
வருà®®்பங் கங்கு ணங்கோà®°் ...... புதியபே à®°ுடனே
கதைகள் செப்பவுà®®் வலச மர்த்திகள்
குணங்கண் டுந்து ளங்கா
மனித னிà®±்சிà®±ு பொà®´ுது à®®ுà®±்à®±ுà®±
நினைந்துà®™் கண்டு கந்தே
கடிà®® லர்ப்பத மணுகு தற்கறி
விலன் பொà®™் குà®®்பெ à®°ுà®®்பா ...... தகனையா ளுவையோ
சிலைத னைக்கொடு à®®ிகஅ டித்திட
மனந்தந் தந்த ணந்தா
மரைà®® லர்ப்பிà®° மனைந டுத்தலை
யரிந்துà®™் கொண்டி ரந்தே
திà®°ிபு ரத்தெà®°ி புகந கைத்தருள்
சிவன்பங் கங்கி à®°ுந்தா ...... ளருளுà®®ா à®®ுà®°ுகா
செà®°ுவி டத்தல கைகள்தெ னத்தென
தெனந்தெந் தெந்தெ னந்தா
எனஇ டக்கைகள் மணிக ணப்பறை
டிகுண்டிà®™் குண்டி குண்டா
டிகுகு டிக்குகு டிகுகு டிக்குகு
டிகுண்டிà®™் குண்டி குண்டீ ...... யெனஇரா வணனீள்
மலையெ னத்திகழ் à®®ுடிகள் பத்தையு
à®®ிரண்டஞ் சொன்ப தொன்à®±ேய்
பணைபு யத்தையு à®®ொà®°ுவ கைப்பட
வெகுண்டம் பொன்à®±ெ à®±ிந்தோன்
மதலை à®®ைத்துன அசுà®° à®°ைக்குடல்
திறந்தங் கம்பி ளந்தே ...... மயிலின்à®®ேல் வருவாய்
வயல்க ளிà®±்கய லினமி குத்தெà®´ு
வரம்பின் கண்பு ரண்டே
பெà®°ுக யற்கொடு சொà®°ியு நித்தில
நிà®±ைந்தெà®™் குஞ்சி றந்தே
வரிசை பெà®±்à®±ுயர் தமனி யப்பதி
யிடங்கொண் டின்பு à®±ுஞ்சீà®°் ...... இளையநா யகனே.
Great article with extensive research. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteGreat article with extensive research. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteVery useful article...I am a regular visitor to this temple and was very interested to know more about the history and sculptures in this temple.Luckily I have seen this article.My next visit is going to be a very informative one for me..
ReplyDeleteThank you. It's my pleasure.
DeleteThanks for the wonderful take on the inscriptions. I am a resident of Madampakkam and I have been searching for details about the inscriptions. In fact I was always wondering where is any inscription that tells that this temple was built by Paranthaka II. Now, your article has cleared it.
ReplyDeleteOne question though...I could find (read) two inscriptions that mention "Veerarajendra chozha devarkku yandu". Why did you not mention this name at all in the list of inscriptions. Who is this Veera Rajendra?
--Ram